13 Jun 2017
Mr President,
My statement refers to the OHCHR’s report A/HRC35/4 on conscientious objection to military service.
Singapore does not recognise the universal applicability of the right to conscientious objection to military service. In our view, HRC resolution 20/2 goes beyond what is prescribed in international law and applicable human rights instruments.
The resolution refers to the conscientious objection to military service as a legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. But Article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognises that the exercise of such rights and freedoms is subject to limitations to meet the requirements of public order and the general welfare of the society.
National defence is a fundamental sovereign right under international law. As a small city-state with limited manpower and resources, Singapore has no choice but to base our defence on citizen armed forces.
National Service is the bedrock of our defence and internal security. It underpins the peace and prosperity we enjoy, and safeguards our independence and sovereignty.
But this system is only viable under the principle of universality by which every male Singapore Citizen and Permanent Resident, regardless of race or religion, fulfils their obligations to defend our country.
Singapore respects the constitutional right to the freedom of religion. However, allowing individuals to avoid military service or choose alternative forms is unfair to those who serve and will compromise the defence of Singapore.
This year we celebrate 50 years of National Service and pay tribute to the contributions and sacrifices of past and present National Servicemen.
National Service continues to enjoy overwhelming public support, with 98% of Singaporeans polled in 2013 agreeing that it is necessary for the security and prosperity of the country.
Such strong support exists only because National Service in Singapore is, universal, equitable, and underpinned by law.
I thank you Mr President.