22 Jan 2024
Thank you, Chair.
Singapore aligns itself with the statements made by Cuba on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, and Samoa on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS).
2 I also thank the co-chairs of the preparatory committee for the 4th SIDS Conference: Maldives and New Zealand, host of the conference Antigua and Barbuda, Under-Secretary-General Li Junhua, and High Representative Rabab Fatima for convening the first session of the preparatory committee’s work. Our discussions this week are highly important for Small Island Developing States (SIDS), as we are shaping our programme of action for the next decade.
Madam Chair,
3 Since the last Conference in 2014, SIDS have made progress in pursuing sustainable and resilient growth and development. However, the world continues to face numerous challenges, and SIDS are disproportionately affected. We must therefore design an ambitious programme of action that will benefit SIDS. Let me lay out three key priorities.
4 First, climate change. As a small, low-lying island state, climate change is a real threat to Singapore. It could undo our work in sustainable development. Singapore has thus remained steadfast in climate action. We have raised our climate ambition to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, and are pursuing renewable energy. But we need shared ambition, and shared commitment. And the outcome document for the Conference must reflect this. We hope to see strong support for effective implementation of the UNFCCC and its Paris Agreement, building on the outcomes of COP-28.
5 Second, digitalisation. Digitalisation is key to overcoming the and constraints faced by SIDS, implementing the Sustainable Development Goals, and building a resilient future. We must close the digital divide. International cooperation in the digital domain will also be essential to harness digitalisation to enable sustainable development.
6 Third, multidimensional vulnerability. All countries are vulnerable, but in different ways. We must recognize that. Yet while the international community has acknowledged vulnerability as an obstacle to development, there remains no definitive benchmark to measure structural vulnerability across multiple dimensions. The Multidimensional Vulnerability Index (MVI) can fill this gap. It can provide a better diagnosis of challenges faced by developing countries, and paint a clearer picture of their needs. We call on the international community to support the MVI and its implementation.
Madam Chair,
7 Singapore remains committed to an ambitious, action-oriented programme of action for SIDS. We look forward to robust discussions.
8 Thank you.
. . . . .